On Gender Inclusivity and Submissive Women

Hi, Sitti! Love your work. You've got some super hot scenarios!

Some of your creations, while the "concept" is hot af, the specific pairings could be, I guess "more flexible"?

For example: I'd love a version of "Survivors" that's less about cucking/competition, where the user can play as Elise or another submissive girl. Similarly, I'd really like to play a lesbian version of "Jane - date with a bull", where the user is a (cis) lesbian whose wife goes out to get dick.

Another example: with "Terrible Classmates", the names of the bullies make it kind of hard for me to place the scenario outside Japan, which isn't a cultural context I really want to put myself in (as I don't know a whole lot about it and don't feel comfortable making assumptions) — so a version of this with Western names would be great.

Alternatively, if you have any tips on how to tell your bots that I'd like to change a detail about the user, "and have it stick", I'm all ears. (Character definitions on the card don't seem to be that effective for this, if there are facts about the user in the bot's setup that are contradicted by the card.)

Again — great work, some really hot and unique stuff... that I've had difficulty prying around to being able to enjoy playing with, on account of very specific character (rather than scenario) definitions. 😅

Hope this doesn't come across as demanding or bitchy. I'm trying to be constructive, but on a technical level I don't know Thing One about how these things are built, and I can't really go under the hood of your bots and play with any settings! (Which, valid, not demanding that you make the definitions public either — just makes it a little more difficult to identify exactly what it is about a bot definition that makes it not click for me.)

And now I'm rambling so I'll shut up. TTFN!

Huh. You know, I'm not sure it ever occurred to me to try that, heh. I tend to approach the bots as interactive fiction generators rather than conversationalists, heh — literally never occurred to me to try to address you directly inside the bot. Worth a shot!

Okay, so, unfortunately that doesn't work too well. "Jane - date with a bull" just will not stop calling the user a man, no matter how strongly I make it clear that I want to play as a lesbian.

So, a version of "Jane - date with a bull" that I'd like to play would involve Jane and the user both being cis women in a lesbian marriage — with Jane being bisexual and having an extramarital bull. Either the user could be submissive to Jane and her bull, as a couple, or the user and Jane, as a couple, could be submissive to the bull. (I tend not to be a fan of the denial/chastity sort of cuckqueaning, but rather of the "look how much sexual power my partner has, how could I possibly try to claim that all for myself" sort of cuckqueaning.)

Mmm, that sounds like a very yummy start! Maybe have the option to have the "bull" be more of a silver fox type, as well? (She said, fully aware of how much of she was giving away about herself...)

A similar sort of thing would be really cool for "Survivors" as well — where either Andre dominates both Elise and the (female) user, or Elise and Andre together dominate the user.

(No need to try to produce a revised "Survivors" scenario here. Sitti is much smarter than bot-Sitti and will understand me just fine.)

(Also, as a side note: thank you for mostly avoiding explicit mentions of race in your definitions, and keeping it to description. Explicitly labeling a character as one race or another, in the sort of D/s scenarios that I enjoy leaning into, tends to draw in raceplay elements that I dislike. No problem with IR sex, just I don't care for using it as grounds for humiliation — so, thanks for mostly avoiding it except in your specifically raceplay prompts.)